Case no. : Year 15 constitutional 17
Year : 2013
Litigant : Mohamed Ahmed Abdul Salam ، Capacity : Contester

Sentence

President :Maher El-Beheiry

The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.

، Constitutional commissioners’ report :

Verdict:

The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.The court decided the unconstitutionality of the provision (1) of Article (3) of the Presidential Decree Law No. 162 of 1958 authorizing the President of the Republic to authorize arrest and detention and to search persons and places without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer. without complying with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The government committed to the expenses and the amount of 200 pounds for the lawyer.